摘 要
地方行政立法作为国家治理体系的重要组成部分，其科学性与民主性直接关系到法治政府建设的成效。本研究基于当前地方行政立法实践中存在的程序不规范、公众参与不足等问题，旨在构建科学性与民主性的双重保障机制。研究采用文献分析、案例研究和比较研究等方法，系统考察了国内外地方行政立法的理论与实践。研究发现，科学性保障机制应着重完善立法前评估、专家论证和风险评估等制度设计；民主性保障机制则需强化公众参与渠道、优化听证程序和健全意见反馈机制。创新性地提出了"双轨并行"的保障模式，即通过建立立法质量评估体系和公众参与指数评价体系，实现科学性与民主性的动态平衡与协同发展。
关键词：地方行政立法 科学性保障机制 立法质量评估
Abstract
As an important part of the national governance system, the scientific and democratic nature of local administrative legislation is directly related to the effectiveness of the construction of a law-based government. Based on the problems such as non-standard procedures and insufficient public participation in the current local administrative legislation practice, this study aims to build a scientific and democratic dual guarantee mechanism. The methods of literature analysis, case study and comparative study are used to systematically investigate the theory and practice of local administrative legislation at home and abroad. It is found that the scientific guarantee mechanism should focus on improving the system design of pre-legislation evaluation, expert demonstration and risk assessment; the democratic guarantee mechanism should strengthen the public participation channels, optimize the hearing procedure and improve the feedback mechanism.innovatively put forward the "dual-track" guarantee mode, that is, through the establishment of legislative quality evaluation system and public participation index evaluation system, to achieve the dynamic balance and coordinated development of scientific and democratic.
Keyword: Local administrative legislation Scientific guarantee mechanism Quality assessment of legislation
目 录
1绪论 1
1.1研究背景与意义 1
1.2研究现状 1
1.3研究方法与思路 1
2地方行政立法科学性的理论基础 2
2.1行政立法科学性的内涵解析 2
2.2地方行政立法的科学性要求 2
2.3科学性保障的理论依据 3
3地方行政立法民主性的制度构建 4
3.1民主参与机制的理论基础 4
3.2公众参与立法的现状分析 4
3.3民主性保障的制度完善路径 5
4科学性与民主性协调的保障机制 6
4.1科学性与民主性的辩证关系 6
4.2双重价值目标的实现路径 6
4.3保障机制的优化建议 7
5结论 7
参考文献 9
致谢 10
地方行政立法作为国家治理体系的重要组成部分，其科学性与民主性直接关系到法治政府建设的成效。本研究基于当前地方行政立法实践中存在的程序不规范、公众参与不足等问题，旨在构建科学性与民主性的双重保障机制。研究采用文献分析、案例研究和比较研究等方法，系统考察了国内外地方行政立法的理论与实践。研究发现，科学性保障机制应着重完善立法前评估、专家论证和风险评估等制度设计；民主性保障机制则需强化公众参与渠道、优化听证程序和健全意见反馈机制。创新性地提出了"双轨并行"的保障模式，即通过建立立法质量评估体系和公众参与指数评价体系，实现科学性与民主性的动态平衡与协同发展。
关键词：地方行政立法 科学性保障机制 立法质量评估
Abstract
As an important part of the national governance system, the scientific and democratic nature of local administrative legislation is directly related to the effectiveness of the construction of a law-based government. Based on the problems such as non-standard procedures and insufficient public participation in the current local administrative legislation practice, this study aims to build a scientific and democratic dual guarantee mechanism. The methods of literature analysis, case study and comparative study are used to systematically investigate the theory and practice of local administrative legislation at home and abroad. It is found that the scientific guarantee mechanism should focus on improving the system design of pre-legislation evaluation, expert demonstration and risk assessment; the democratic guarantee mechanism should strengthen the public participation channels, optimize the hearing procedure and improve the feedback mechanism.innovatively put forward the "dual-track" guarantee mode, that is, through the establishment of legislative quality evaluation system and public participation index evaluation system, to achieve the dynamic balance and coordinated development of scientific and democratic.
Keyword: Local administrative legislation Scientific guarantee mechanism Quality assessment of legislation
目 录
1绪论 1
1.1研究背景与意义 1
1.2研究现状 1
1.3研究方法与思路 1
2地方行政立法科学性的理论基础 2
2.1行政立法科学性的内涵解析 2
2.2地方行政立法的科学性要求 2
2.3科学性保障的理论依据 3
3地方行政立法民主性的制度构建 4
3.1民主参与机制的理论基础 4
3.2公众参与立法的现状分析 4
3.3民主性保障的制度完善路径 5
4科学性与民主性协调的保障机制 6
4.1科学性与民主性的辩证关系 6
4.2双重价值目标的实现路径 6
4.3保障机制的优化建议 7
5结论 7
参考文献 9
致谢 10
