摘 要
行政复议与行政诉讼作为行政救济体系的两大核心制度，其衔接机制的完善程度直接影响着公民权利救济的实效性。本研究以我国现行法律框架为基础，采用规范分析、比较研究和实证调查相结合的方法，系统考察了行政复议与行政诉讼在受案范围、审查标准、程序衔接等方面的现状与问题。研究发现，当前两大制度在功能定位上存在重叠与冲突，程序衔接机制不够顺畅，导致实践中出现"重复审查""程序空转"等问题。针对这些问题，本文提出了构建"复议前置为主、选择并行补充"的衔接模式，明确划分两大制度的审查边界，建立信息共享与结果互认机制等创新性建议。
关键词：行政复议 行政诉讼 衔接机制
Abstract
As the two core systems of administrative relief system, administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation, the perfection of their connection mechanism directly affects the effectiveness of citizens' rights relief. Based on the current legal fr amework in China, this study adopts the method of combining normative analysis, comparative research and empirical investigation, and systematically examines the current situation and problems of administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation in the scope of accepting cases, review standards and procedure connection. The study found that there are overlapping and conflicts in the functional positioning of the two systems, and the program connection mechanism is not smooth enough, leading to the problems of "repeated review" and "program idling" in practice. In view of these problems, this paper puts forward innovative suggestions such as constructing the connection mode of "giving reconsideration front and selecting parallel supplement", clearly dividing the review boundary of the two systems, and establishing the mechanism of information sharing and mutual recognition of results.
Keyword: administrative review administrative action cohesive mechanism
目 录
1绪论 1
1.1研究背景 1
1.2研究意义 1
1.3国内外研究现状 1
2行政复议与行政诉讼衔接的理论基础 2
2.1行政救济制度的法理基础据 2
2.2行政复议与行政诉讼的功能定位 2
2.3两种救济方式的制度差异分析 3
3行政复议与行政诉讼衔接的实践困境 4
3.1受案范围衔接问题分析 4
3.2审查标准差异导致的衔接障碍 4
3.3程序转换中的效率与公正冲突 5
4完善行政复议与行政诉讼衔接机制的对策建议 6
4.1构建统一的受案范围标准体系 6
4.2建立协调一致的审查标准体系 6
4.3优化程序转换机制的具体路径 7
5结论 8
参考文献 9
致谢 10
行政复议与行政诉讼作为行政救济体系的两大核心制度，其衔接机制的完善程度直接影响着公民权利救济的实效性。本研究以我国现行法律框架为基础，采用规范分析、比较研究和实证调查相结合的方法，系统考察了行政复议与行政诉讼在受案范围、审查标准、程序衔接等方面的现状与问题。研究发现，当前两大制度在功能定位上存在重叠与冲突，程序衔接机制不够顺畅，导致实践中出现"重复审查""程序空转"等问题。针对这些问题，本文提出了构建"复议前置为主、选择并行补充"的衔接模式，明确划分两大制度的审查边界，建立信息共享与结果互认机制等创新性建议。
关键词：行政复议 行政诉讼 衔接机制
Abstract
As the two core systems of administrative relief system, administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation, the perfection of their connection mechanism directly affects the effectiveness of citizens' rights relief. Based on the current legal fr amework in China, this study adopts the method of combining normative analysis, comparative research and empirical investigation, and systematically examines the current situation and problems of administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation in the scope of accepting cases, review standards and procedure connection. The study found that there are overlapping and conflicts in the functional positioning of the two systems, and the program connection mechanism is not smooth enough, leading to the problems of "repeated review" and "program idling" in practice. In view of these problems, this paper puts forward innovative suggestions such as constructing the connection mode of "giving reconsideration front and selecting parallel supplement", clearly dividing the review boundary of the two systems, and establishing the mechanism of information sharing and mutual recognition of results.
Keyword: administrative review administrative action cohesive mechanism
目 录
1绪论 1
1.1研究背景 1
1.2研究意义 1
1.3国内外研究现状 1
2行政复议与行政诉讼衔接的理论基础 2
2.1行政救济制度的法理基础据 2
2.2行政复议与行政诉讼的功能定位 2
2.3两种救济方式的制度差异分析 3
3行政复议与行政诉讼衔接的实践困境 4
3.1受案范围衔接问题分析 4
3.2审查标准差异导致的衔接障碍 4
3.3程序转换中的效率与公正冲突 5
4完善行政复议与行政诉讼衔接机制的对策建议 6
4.1构建统一的受案范围标准体系 6
4.2建立协调一致的审查标准体系 6
4.3优化程序转换机制的具体路径 7
5结论 8
参考文献 9
致谢 10
