摘 要
民法中物权请求权与债权保护作为权利救济的两种重要方式，在理论体系和实践应用上存在诸多差异，随着市场经济的发展和社会关系的复杂化，二者之间的界限愈发模糊且相互影响加深，深入比较研究具有必要性。本研究旨在通过对比分析物权请求权与债权保护在概念界定、构成要件、行使效力等方面的异同，揭示二者在法律适用中的内在逻辑联系与区别，以期为完善我国民事立法提供理论支持。采用文献研究法收集国内外相关研究成果，运用比较分析法对两者进行多维度剖析。结果表明，物权请求权侧重于恢复权利人对标的物的圆满支配状态，债权保护则致力于保障债权人基于合同等产生的期待利益；物权请求权不以实际损害为前提，债权保护通常需证明违约或侵权事实及损害后果。
关键词：物权请求权 债权保护 法律适用
Abstract
As the two important ways of right relief, the protection of real right claim and creditor's right have many differences in theoretical system and practical application. With the development of market economy and the complexity of social relations, the boundary between the two is increasingly blurred and the mutual influence is deepened, so in-depth comparative study is necessary. This study aims to compare and analyze the similarities and differences between property right claim and creditor's rights protection in terms of concept definition, constituent requirements and exercise effect, and reveal the internal logical connection and difference between the two in the application of law, so as to provide theoretical support for the improvement of civil legislation in China. The literature research method is used to collect relevant research results at home and abroad, and the comparative analysis method is used to analyze the two dimensions. The results show that the real right claim focuses on restoring the satisfactory control of the right holder over the subject matter, while the protection of the creditor's right is committed to protecting the expected interests of the creditor based on the contract; the real right claim is not based on the actual damage, and the creditor's right protection usually needs to prove the facts of breach or infringement and the consequences of the damage.
Keyword:Right to claim property right Protection of creditor's rights application of law
目 录
1绪论 5
1.1研究背景与意义 5
1.2国内外研究现状 5
1.3研究方法与思路 6
2物权请求权与债权保护的理论基础 6
2.1物权请求权的概念与特征 6
2.2债权保护的基本原理 7
2.3两者在民法体系中的地位 7
3物权请求权与债权保护的构成要件比较 8
3.1权利主体与客体分析 8
3.2行使条件对比 8
3.3效力范围的差异 9
4物权请求权与债权保护的救济方式比较 10
4.1物权请求权的救济途径 10
4.2债权保护的实现手段 10
4.3两种救济方式的效果评估 11
5结论 11
参考文献 13
致谢 14
民法中物权请求权与债权保护作为权利救济的两种重要方式，在理论体系和实践应用上存在诸多差异，随着市场经济的发展和社会关系的复杂化，二者之间的界限愈发模糊且相互影响加深，深入比较研究具有必要性。本研究旨在通过对比分析物权请求权与债权保护在概念界定、构成要件、行使效力等方面的异同，揭示二者在法律适用中的内在逻辑联系与区别，以期为完善我国民事立法提供理论支持。采用文献研究法收集国内外相关研究成果，运用比较分析法对两者进行多维度剖析。结果表明，物权请求权侧重于恢复权利人对标的物的圆满支配状态，债权保护则致力于保障债权人基于合同等产生的期待利益；物权请求权不以实际损害为前提，债权保护通常需证明违约或侵权事实及损害后果。
关键词：物权请求权 债权保护 法律适用
Abstract
As the two important ways of right relief, the protection of real right claim and creditor's right have many differences in theoretical system and practical application. With the development of market economy and the complexity of social relations, the boundary between the two is increasingly blurred and the mutual influence is deepened, so in-depth comparative study is necessary. This study aims to compare and analyze the similarities and differences between property right claim and creditor's rights protection in terms of concept definition, constituent requirements and exercise effect, and reveal the internal logical connection and difference between the two in the application of law, so as to provide theoretical support for the improvement of civil legislation in China. The literature research method is used to collect relevant research results at home and abroad, and the comparative analysis method is used to analyze the two dimensions. The results show that the real right claim focuses on restoring the satisfactory control of the right holder over the subject matter, while the protection of the creditor's right is committed to protecting the expected interests of the creditor based on the contract; the real right claim is not based on the actual damage, and the creditor's right protection usually needs to prove the facts of breach or infringement and the consequences of the damage.
Keyword:Right to claim property right Protection of creditor's rights application of law
目 录
1绪论 5
1.1研究背景与意义 5
1.2国内外研究现状 5
1.3研究方法与思路 6
2物权请求权与债权保护的理论基础 6
2.1物权请求权的概念与特征 6
2.2债权保护的基本原理 7
2.3两者在民法体系中的地位 7
3物权请求权与债权保护的构成要件比较 8
3.1权利主体与客体分析 8
3.2行使条件对比 8
3.3效力范围的差异 9
4物权请求权与债权保护的救济方式比较 10
4.1物权请求权的救济途径 10
4.2债权保护的实现手段 10
4.3两种救济方式的效果评估 11
5结论 11
参考文献 13
致谢 14
